With the occurrence of the French Revolution in 1789, this revolution became an object for the subject, and thinkers in the field of society sought to write a theory for it. However, what was added to the stock of social sciences during nearly two centuries of study, were different and conflicting theories about a single phenomenon that was called revolution. By dividing the studies of revolution into three field of the philosophy of revolution, theories of revolution and the results of revolution, this study stands in results of revolution field and tries to examine the implicit attitudes about the results of revolutions in the political thought of Hannah Arendt and Edmund Burke. what is the difference between Hannah Arendt and Edmund Burke in their view of the French Revolution? What is the reason for this difference? These are the questions that guide this article. The article has come to the conclusion that while Hannah Arendt has a tragic view to the results of revolutions, Edmund Burke's view to the results of revolutions is dramatic. The dramatic view shows the contrast between good and evil forces. Tragic view shows the contrast between multiple values. This article tries to show the difference of attitudes towards the single phenomenon of the results of the French Revolution in the framework of sociology as an art, through the method of comparative study. The goal of this research is to provide a theoretical framework for comparative studies of the results of revolutions.